2019年7月10日 星期三

政治與經濟無關?(下)

上文寫到如何讓市民分享社會發展的成果,我想到幾個方法,現在簡單寫一寫。

1)政府可以牽頭成立一個投資機構,類似新加坡的淡馬錫,引入金融界才俊為骨幹,將每年10%既稅收注入機構,再將稅收買入債券、股票、外國房地產等收取利息,加配少量槓桿,淨收益一半回歸政府,一半用作再投資,從而達到還富於民的效果。

2)帶頭刺激經濟,目前服務小眾的零售商戶所面對的最大問題,就是租金太貴,政府可以提供租金補貼,幫助一些有盈利的商戶繼續經營,但商戶獲得資助後,必須呈報會計帳目,證明每年錄得盈利增長,否則停止資助。這樣可以減輕中小企的成本,同時鼓勵他們增加收入。

3)修改移民政策,所有24-50歲以家庭團聚為理由獲得單程證人士,無論是否需要報稅,頭五年都必須上報工作收入,以證明對社會有貢獻,除非有特殊原因獲得豁免(比如需照顧兒女無法工作或傷殘等),否則向未有貢獻者徵收懲罰性稅款。

4)鼓勵本土投資,改善延期年金計劃,讓年老市民能夠不必依賴租金收入,也可以頣養天年。

這些計劃說穿了,就是需要推手。到底政府願意做得多徹底呢?

11 則留言:

  1. 政府好似已做緊 1 和 4 !

    回覆刪除
  2. I have one more interesting idea that no one ever proposed:
    Every people with the age of 18, will be granted a HK-citizen flat-owner certificate of 300 sq feet.

    People can decide whether to sell this certificate in secondary market in HKEX or to use it for themselves to buy a private flat/public flat.

    If you buy a flat of say 500 sq feet, you will need to buy extra flat-owner certificate from gov or from HKEX. Otherwise the buyer will be charged for punishment fine for the missing 200 sq feet.

    There are some good points for this policy.
    1. The more properties you owned, the more flat-owner certificate you need to buy.
    This will create a nature demand for flat-owner certificate and force some people to sell the flat if he cannot buy enough flat-owner certificate.
    This will increase flat supply indirectly in second hand market.

    2. Young people with the age of 18 may not have enough money to create a new business. They can then sell the owner certificate in secondary market to raise capital for starting a new business.

    3. This policy encourages more people to give birth to a baby as everyone with age of 18 can get a free flat-owner certificate. This reduce the aging problem in HK.

    4. The most exciting part of this policy is that GOV does not need to spend any money on this. What it needs is to build a IT system to record the flat-owner certificate.

    回覆刪除
    回覆
    1. 作者已經移除這則留言。

      刪除
    2. 主意很好呀,問題是政府把許多土地賣給地產商了,所以要每人分得300呎的話,需要造地才行。

      刪除
    3. 即係丁權,原居民的問題是有丁沒地,結果如何?咪就係無地的人把丁權賣給大地主。

      刪除